A function ( f: \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{R}) is said to be ( s)-Fourier sparse if its Fourier expansion contains at most ( s) nonzero coefficients. In general, the existence of a sparse representation in the Fourier basis serves as a key enabler for the design of efficient learning algorithms. However, most existing techniques assume prior knowledge of the function's Fourier sparsity, with algorithmic parameters carefully tuned to this value. This motivates the following decision problem: given ( s > 0), determine whether a function is ( s)-Fourier sparse. In this work, we study the problem of tolerant testing of Fourier Sparsity for real-valued functions over ( \mathbb{F}_2^n), accessed via oracle queries. The goal is to decide whether a given function is close to being ( s)-Fourier sparse or far from every ( s)-Fourier sparse function. Our algorithm provides an estimator that, given oracle access to the function, estimates its distance to the nearest ( s)-Fourier sparse function with query complexity ( \widetilde{O}(s)), for constant accuracy and confidence parameters. A key structural ingredient in our analysis is a new spectral concentration result for real-valued functions over ( \mathbb{F}_2^n) when restricted to small-dimensional random affine subspaces. We further complement our upper bound with a matching lower bound of ( \Omega(s)), establishing that our tester is optimal up to logarithmic factors.

The goal of this paper is to investigate the complexity of gradient algorithms when learning sparse functions (juntas). We introduce a type of Statistical Queries ($\mathsf{SQ}$), which we call Differentiable Learning Queries ($\mathsf{DLQ}$), to model gradient queries on a specified loss with respect to an arbitrary model. We provide a tight characterization of the query complexity of $\mathsf{DLQ}$ for learning the support of a sparse function over generic product distributions. This complexity crucially depends on the loss function. For the squared loss, $\mathsf{DLQ}$ matches the complexity of Correlation Statistical Queries $(\mathsf{CSQ})$--potentially much worse than $\mathsf{SQ}$. But for other simple loss functions, including the $\ell_1$ loss, $\mathsf{DLQ}$ always achieves the same complexity as $\mathsf{SQ}$. We also provide evidence that $\mathsf{DLQ}$ can indeed capture learning with (stochastic) gradient descent by showing it correctly describes the complexity of learning with a two-layer neural network in the mean field regime and linear scaling.

"juntas" [Blum and Langley, 1997]), that is functions that depend only on a small number

We introduce the Multiple Quantile Graphical Model (MQGM), which extends the neighborhood selection approach of Meinshausen and Buhlmann for learning sparse graphical models. The latter is defined by the basic subproblem of modeling the conditional mean of one variable as a sparse function of all others. Our approach models a set of conditional quantiles of one variable as a sparse function of all others, and hence offers a much richer, more expressive class of conditional distribution estimates. We establish that, under suitable regularity conditions, the MQGM identifies the exact conditional independencies with probability tending to one as the problem size grows, even outside of the usual homoskedastic Gaussian data model. We develop an efficient algorithm for fitting the MQGM using the alternating direction method of multipliers. We also describe a strategy for sampling from the joint distribution that underlies the MQGM estimate. Lastly, we present detailed experiments that demonstrate the flexibility and effectiveness of the MQGM in modeling hetereoskedastic non-Gaussian data.

"juntas" [Blum and Langley, 1997]), that is functions that depend only on a small number

Overparametrized Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have demonstrated remarkable success in a wide variety of domains too high-dimensional for classical shallow networks subject to the curse of dimensionality. However, open questions about fundamental principles, that govern the learning dynamics of DNNs, remain. In this position paper we argue that it is the ability of DNNs to exploit the compositionally sparse structure of the target function driving their success. As such, DNNs can leverage the property that most practically relevant functions can be composed from a small set of constituent functions, each of which relies only on a low-dimensional subset of all inputs. We show that this property is shared by all efficiently Turing-computable functions and is therefore highly likely present in all current learning problems. While some promising theoretical insights on questions concerned with approximation and generalization exist in the setting of compositionally sparse functions, several important questions on the learnability and optimization of DNNs remain. Completing the picture of the role of compositional sparsity in deep learning is essential to a comprehensive theory of artificial, and even general, intelligence.

The goal of this paper is to investigate the complexity of gradient algorithms when learning sparse functions (juntas). We introduce a type of Statistical Queries ($\mathsf{SQ}$), which we call Differentiable Learning Queries ($\mathsf{DLQ}$), to model gradient queries on a specified loss with respect to an arbitrary model. We provide a tight characterization of the query complexity of $\mathsf{DLQ}$ for learning the support of a sparse function over generic product distributions. This complexity crucially depends on the loss function. For the squared loss, $\mathsf{DLQ}$ matches the complexity of Correlation Statistical Queries $(\mathsf{CSQ})$--potentially much worse than $\mathsf{SQ}$. But for other simple loss functions, including the $\ell_1$ loss, $\mathsf{DLQ}$ always achieves the same complexity as $\mathsf{SQ}$. We also provide evidence that $\mathsf{DLQ}$ can indeed capture learning with (stochastic) gradient descent by showing it correctly describes the complexity of learning with a two-layer neural network in the mean field regime and linear scaling.

In this paper, we study the inductive biases in convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which are believed to be vital drivers behind CNNs' exceptional performance on vision-like tasks. We first analyze the universality of CNNs, i.e., the ability to approximate continuous functions. We prove that a depth of $\mathcal{O}(\log d)$ is sufficient for achieving universality, where $d$ is the input dimension. This is a significant improvement over existing results that required a depth of $\Omega(d)$. We also prove that learning sparse functions with CNNs needs only $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\log^2d)$ samples, indicating that deep CNNs can efficiently capture long-range sparse correlations. Note that all these are achieved through a novel combination of increased network depth and the utilization of multichanneling and downsampling. Lastly, we study the inductive biases of weight sharing and locality through the lens of symmetry. To separate two biases, we introduce locally-connected networks (LCNs), which can be viewed as CNNs without weight sharing. Specifically, we compare the performance of CNNs, LCNs, and fully-connected networks (FCNs) on a simple regression task. We prove that LCNs require ${\Omega}(d)$ samples while CNNs need only $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\log^2d)$ samples, which highlights the cruciality of weight sharing. We also prove that FCNs require $\Omega(d^2)$ samples while LCNs need only $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d)$ samples, demonstrating the importance of locality. These provable separations quantify the difference between the two biases, and our major observation behind is that weight sharing and locality break different symmetries in the learning process.